CPLR § 5511 Permissible appellant and respondent
Santos v County of Westchester, 2011 NY Slip Op 01013 (App. Div., 2nd 2011)
The appeal by the County defendants must be dismissed. Since they did not oppose the City's cross motion before the Supreme Court, they are not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511).
CPLR § 5701 Appeals to appellate division from supreme and county courts
Wright v Stam, 2011 NY Slip Op 01020 (App. Div., 2nd 2011)
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the motion which was to appoint a guardian ad litem on the plaintiff's behalf only to the extent of directing a hearing on that issue is dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from an order directing a hearing to aid in the determination of a motion, and we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Zoref v Glassman, 44 AD3d 1036); and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as, sua sponte, directed the plaintiff to undergo a psychological evaluation is dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from an order which does not determine a motion made on notice, and we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Ciprijan v Stone, 65 AD3d 659); and it is further,
The bold is mine.
bruteforcelawyer.com 