Just a reminder

Goldstein v Guida, 2010 NY Slip Op 05513 (App. Div, 2nd, 2010)(Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court
properly held Guida liable for the damages incurred by the plaintiff as a
result of the conversion of the chairs (see Ingram v Michael and Jr.
Auto Repair,
148 AD2d 324, 325)).

Haracz v Cee Jay, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 05514 (App. Div., 2nd, 2010)(Where, as here, the movant fails to sustain its initial burden of making
a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law,
summary judgment should be denied regardless of the sufficiency of the
opposing papers (see Ayotte v Gervasio, 81 NY2d 1062, 1063; Alvarez
v Prospect Hosp.,
68 NY2d at 324)).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: